We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work as well as analytics cookie and third-party cookies to monitor our traffic and to personalise content and ads.
Please click “Cookies Settings” for details on how to withdraw your consent and how to block cookies. For more detailed information about the cookies we use and of who we work this see our cookies notice
Necessary cookies:
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website and cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will then not work. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Optional cookies:
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers. We work with third parties and make use of third party cookies to make advertising messaging more relevant to you both on and off this website.
The Intelligent Allocator: Investing like a Viking – portfolio strategy and navigation lessons
Michael Strobaek
Global CIO Private Bank
Clément Dumur
Portfolio Manager
key takeaways.
A successful investment strategy, like a successful voyage, is built on a sound strategic foundational framework, tactical adjustments, prudent instrument selection, and aligned with investors’ risk tolerance
Strategic allocations blend assets to improve risk-adjusted outcomes through discipline and structure
Frequent equity market swings offer opportunities to supplement a portfolio’s strategic allocation with tactical moves, but these should be informed and considered
Staying in cash can offer safety, but committing capital to markets and assuming some form of investment risk has historically proved a better way to maximise returns.
In our previous Intelligent Allocator we argued that attempts to avoid market corrections often prove costlier than riding them out. Some readers wondered whether this expressed scepticism towards active investment management. Hardly. The choice is not between active and passive strategies, but rather between sitting indefinitely in cash or investing nimbly with a core strategy that adapts as the world shifts – our analysis offers clear answers.
To use an historical analogy, for more than three centuries, Scandinavia’s Vikings ventured far beyond their home waters, reaching as far as ‘Vinland’ on the coast of North America. They sailed west not because they could accurately forecast the weather, but because they combined determination with seamanship skills honed over generations. Of course, venturing out of harbour requires the notion of accepting risk. Many investors prefer to linger behind, moored in cash, thinking that avoiding every storm is prudent seamanship. But while they’re on a ship technically, practically their portfolios are going nowhere.
Many investors prefer to linger behind, moored in cash, thinking that avoiding every storm is prudent seamanship
Sign up for our newsletter
A disciplined investment strategy rests on three pillars:
Strategic asset allocation (SAA) is the foundational framework – choosing the right vessel to set course to the chosen destination, understanding long-term currents, and so maximising the probability of reaching a far shore. It reflects the realities of the journey: the capacity to take risk, time horizon, liquidity needs, and the tolerance for discomfort when the waves rise higher than forecast. Adjustments are rare and intentional, much like nudging the tiller to correct course rather than spinning the ship’s wheel in the hope of magically avoiding every cloud on the horizon.
Once the course is set, the tactical asset allocation (TAA) becomes the art of adjusting the sails when conditions shift. It is not an attempt to forecast precise turning points in markets. The TAA is responsive, not predictive. On a voyage, visibility varies, gusts of wind arrive early or late, or currents pull harder than the models assumed. The TAA deals with the world as it is, not as investors wish it would be.
Instrument selection – for example, the choice of investing passively, actively, in funds or in individual securities – is the rigging that ensures the vessel responds to commands. It does not calm a rough sea, but it ensures that the ship obeys the captain. The question is always the same: does this choice of instruments help investors pursue the course set by the SAA, with occasional refinements from the TAA?
Strategic asset allocation blends imperfectly correlated assets to improve risk-adjusted outcomes through discipline and structure
A compass that swings between pessimism and optimism
“In the short run,” said investor Benjamin Graham, “the market is a voting machine; in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” In other words, in the short term markets misprice risk because sentiment dominates, but over time fundamentals reassert themselves. Equally useful is his reminder that markets oscillate between unjustified pessimism and unsustainable optimism. The intelligent investor, Mr Graham wrote, is a realist who buys from pessimists and sells to optimists.
If we focus on the former – buying from pessimists – history shows that the market has repeatedly offered opportunities for patient investors. Since 1995, the S&P 500 has delivered an average annualised total return of 13%, while the average intra-year drawdown was 15%. Swings are not market anomalies but part of the investment journey.
Nor is this pattern new. Nearly six decades ago, Paul Samuelson, a Nobel-prize-winning economist, wrote in a column for Newsweek that “Wall Street indexes predicted nine of the last five recessions.” That statement still looks sound. Since 1945, the S&P 500 index has seen 24 corrections of 15% or more, while the real US economy has experienced only 13 recessions. Investors, simply put, overreact.
These moments can offer opportunities for tactical adjustments. But knowing when – and when not – to move is the difficult part. Let us look at how SAA, TAA, and market-timing instincts play out in practice by considering three simplified investor portfolios:
Investor 1adopts a pure SAA strategy – sticking to a balanced SAA of 45% equities (S&P 500) and 55% bonds (Bloomberg US Aggregate)
Investor 2 embraces SAA and TAA – investing in a balanced SAA but shifting to a growth profile (65% equities, 35% bonds) after a 15% correction – the average over the last 30 years – and then returning to a balanced SAA when the drawdown ends
Investor 3attempts market timing – staying in 3-month cash deposits and allocating 45% to equities only after a 15% correction, returning to cash at the end of the drawdown.
The outcomes are telling. Investor 2 – with a disciplined combination of SAA and TAA – earned an additional +0.5% per year relative to implementing an SAA alone. Investor 3 – the market timer – fared by far the worst, lagging both the SAA portfolio and the combined SAA and TAA by -3.2% and -3.7% respectively. A ‘market timing’ portfolio therefore preserved the psychological comfort of cash but at the cost of meaningfully worse results.
Here we would caution against making sudden, mechanical TAA adjustments in response to events. Market dislocations, especially after sudden shocks, demand analysis not reflexes. A sensible process should consist of three steps: 1) assess the facts, 2) compare them with historical precedents, and 3) build an informed, unemotional judgment. Many investors unfortunately attempt to leap to the last step, snatching at the wheel with an uninformed and emotional response.
The SAA remains the primary driver of a portfolio’s long-term returns, and while it is possible to debate the percentage contribution of different assets, the principle is not in question. The SAA blends imperfectly correlated assets to improve risk-adjusted outcomes through discipline, structure, and periodic rebalancing based on expected asset class evolutions. The objective is not to outperform markets but to keep investors aligned with their chosen level of risk.
The TAA’s contribution is inherently tied to taking incremental risks. Portfolio risk cannot be eliminated, only priced, and then adjusted or transformed. No tactical decision will ever produce equity-like returns with bond-like volatility. And while market timing offers the illusion of safety, history shows otherwise: after a 15% correction, market-timing investors have realised drawdowns similar to those of SAA investors, but with far lower returns. The resulting Sharpe ratio - a measure of risk-adjusted returns - is roughly 0.3, half that of a pure SAA strategy.
The Vikings’ voyages succeeded not through perfect foresight but through a balance of strategic objectives and tactical skill
In summary, the Vikings’ voyages succeeded not through perfect foresight but through a balance of strategic objectives and tactical skill. Investing is not very different. Rather than waiting for perfect weather, the intelligent allocator knows that the rewards of committing capital come through undertaking the voyage: setting a destination with the SAA, adjusting course with informed TAA decisions, and making a prudent selection of investment instruments along the journey.
CIO Office Viewpoint
The Intelligent Allocator: Investing like a Viking – portfolio strategy and navigation lessons
This is a marketing communication issued by Bank Lombard Odier & Co Ltd (hereinafter “Lombard Odier”).
It is not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or entity to whom it would be unlawful to address such a marketing communication.
share.