When you visit our website, information may be stored or recovered on your device, mainly in the form of cookies. We use essential cookies to ensure the website works as it should, and statistical and marketing cookies for audience measurement and content customisation purposes. We rely on Google for statistical and marketing cookies in order to measure website performance and display relevant advertising. For more information on this, please also refer to the Google policy on Business Data Responsibility.
From the Cookie Management Centre, you can set your preferences with respect to the use of cookies: accept or reject certain categories, accept all, or reject all. For detailed information on all cookies used across these three categories, please refer to our Cookie Policy.
Please note that blocking certain cookies may affect your experience and the services offered.
Essential cookies Always active
Essential cookies help the website to work as it should by enabling necessary functionalities, such as navigating between pages and accessing secure areas. These cannot be disabled in our systems.
Statistical cookies
Statistical cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our site by collecting and communicating browsing information. They make it possible to identify the most and least visited pages and to improve the overall performance of the site.
Marketing cookies
Marketing cookies are used to display relevant advertising and measure the performance of campaigns. If you choose not to allow these cookies, you will continue to see ads, but they will be less relevant to your interests.
Choose the purposes for which we may use Google products to collect and use your data:
User storage: to technically permit advertising functionality.
User data for advertising: to optimise our advertising campaigns.
Ad customisation: to tailor advertising to your interests.
Navigating the dollar’s future under Trump’s tariffs
Dr. Luca Bindelli
Head of Investment Strategy
Kiran Kowshik
Global FX Strategist
key takeaways.
The US dollar has weakened rapidly after higher-than-expected US tariffs. Markets are treating tariffs as ‘stagflationary’ for the US economy, and less damaging for the rest of the world
In March we shifted from a positive to a neutral view on the US dollar against a basket of developed currencies. Dollar upside is now limited by a relatively expensive valuation compared with fair value estimates, and potential capital outflows
The world is braced for other governments to retaliate; any global economic slowdown will hurt the euro area, UK and many other trade-exposed countries as well. We keep our neutral view on the dollar and favour haven currencies like the Japanese yen and Swiss franc
We see slower US growth but a recession remains unlikely, and we expect the US trade deficit, and possibly current account deficit, to improve.
The US dollar has weakened since the Trump administration announced its import tariffs on 2 April, as markets factor in the risk of a slowing American economy and higher inflation. In March, we shifted from a positive to a neutral stance on the US dollar against developed markets, represented by the DXY basket of currencies. Instead, we favour havens such as the Swiss franc and Japanese yen.
The dollar has continued to slide since 2 April, reflecting much larger than expected US tariffs. Markets are interpreting the tariffs as a stagflation risk (stagnant growth, rising inflation) for the US economy. By implication, US tariffs are considered less damaging for the rest of the world, at a time when investors have high allocations to US assets and may be prompted to sell them.
Sign up for our newsletter
For now, US consensus growth estimates are falling. At the beginning of 2025, forecasts pointed to 2.2% gross domestic product growth, which were revised to between 1.5% and 2.0% before 2 April. Since the tariff announcements, gross domestic product (GDP) forecasts have been slashed further with some even suggesting that a recession is possible. Our own revised 2025 US GDP growth forecast is higher than this consensus at 1.2%, compared with 1.8% prior to “Liberation Day,” and 2.4% at the start of the year.
However, we do not expect the rest of the world to escape negative impacts on growth, especially if trade partners retaliate by raising their own tariffs. Signs of this were visible towards the end of last week, when the US dollar began to recover as global markets fell in response to China’s counter tariffs. Historically, the effects of a slowing US economy have spilled over to the rest of the world, weighing on global growth and strengthening the dollar against most currencies, with the exception of traditional havens such as the Japanese yen and Swiss franc.
We do not expect the rest of the world to escape negative impacts on growth, especially if trade partners retaliate
Weaker dollar conditions are not clear cut
For the US dollar to stay weak against growth-sensitive currencies such as the euro, as in 2020 or even in 2016-2017, two pre-conditions are necessary. First, a ‘push’ factor in the form of a shrinking US-foreign yield differential, and a ‘pull’ factor of strong foreign growth compared to the US. The latter has often been driven by strong Chinese stimulus measures (see chart 1).
We expect neither of these factors. We see the Federal Reserve cutting its interest rate to 3.75% at the end of 2025, instead of 4%, and the European Central Bank’s rate reaching 1.5% at the end of their rate cutting cycle, with the Swiss National Bank reaching 0%. This would maintain a wide interest rate differential in the US dollar’s favour – of 225 basis points against the euro, and an unchanged 375 bps against the Swiss franc.
US equity purchases by foreign investors do not show a strong correlation with the dollar
Potential outflows from US equities?
What about capital outflows from the US? The prospect of capital re-allocation away from the US to other regions, and subsequent dollar depreciation, has gained some traction. But US equity purchases by foreign investors do not show a strong correlation with the dollar (see chart 2). The sale of US Treasuries by international investors in response to the tariff war would only makes sense if longer term US bond yields were expected to rise, and lead to negative returns for investors. On the contrary, we expect US 10-year Treasury yields to fall slightly further, and below 4%. This should help expected returns from US Treasury holdings remain positive. For this reason, we do not expect fixed income flows to add US dollar weakness for now.
We believe that risks to our neutral dollar index view are two sided. On the downside, sharper Fed rate cuts, compared to the ECB and Bank of England, would narrow short-term interest rate differentials, and strong Chinese stimulus would eventually weaken the dollar. This could in turn see the EURUSD rise towards a longer-term fair value of 1.15 – 1.20. Conversely, lower growth elsewhere and more stable US growth expectations (for example thanks to a stronger labour market, or improvements in trade and current account imbalances) could see the dollar recover, with EURUSD returning to 1.06, close to the middle of its two-year, 1.02 – 1.12 range.
Both the Japanese yen and Swiss franc are undervalued and act as havens in periods of uncertainty
While our view on EURUSD and the broader dollar index is more neutral, we have a preference for haven currencies like the Swiss franc (CHF) and Japanese yen (JPY). Both currencies are undervalued (see chart 3) and act as havens in periods of uncertainty, which we expect to remain the dominant driver rather than country specific drivers like the view on the SNB and Bank of Japan. We see risks to our current USDJPY and USCHF (currently 144 and 0.85 respectively) as tilted to the downside.
CIO Office Viewpoint
Navigating the dollar’s future under Trump’s tariffs
This is a marketing communication issued by Bank Lombard Odier & Co Ltd (hereinafter “Lombard Odier”).
It is not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or entity to whom it would be unlawful to address such a marketing communication.
share.